A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Digital Health Technology Adoption Among Healthcare Workers

Authors

  • Fita Rusdian Ikawati Universitas Strada Indonesia
  • Atik Setiawan W Universitas Strada Indonesia
  • Novita Ana Anggraini Universitas Strada Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59680/ventilator.v4i1.2387

Keywords:

Digital Health, PU, PEOU, Technology Acceptance Model, Technology Adoption

Abstract

Digital transformation in the healthcare sector has encouraged the use of various technologies, such as telemedicine, electronic health records, mobile health, and health information systems. However, the successful implementation digital health technology depends not only on system readiness, but also on the acceptance of healthcare professionals as the main users. This study aims systematically review how the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been used to explain the adoption digital health technology among healthcare workers. The method used was systematic review of scientific articles from reputable databases discussing the application TAM in the context of digital health technology. The selected articles were empirical studies involving healthcare professionals and applying TAM in its original extended forms. The review found that perceived usefulness and perceived ease use were the most consistent constructs in explaining behavioral intention and use behavior. In addition, TAM was often extended by including variables such as subjective norm, self-efficacy, compatibility, experience, training, anxiety, habit, facilitating conditions, and organizational context. These findings indicate that healthcare professionals’ acceptance of technology influenced not only by perceived benefits and ease of use, but also by social, individual, and organizational factors. Therefore, TAM remains relevant as a basic framework, especially in its extended form.

References

Aggelidis, V. P., & Chatzoglou, P. D. (2009). Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.006

AlQudah, A. A., Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2021). Technology acceptance in healthcare: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 11(22), 10537. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210537

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Gagnon, M.-P., Orruño, E., Asua, J., Abdeljelil, A. B., & Emparanza, J. (2014). Electronic health record acceptance by physicians: Testing an integrated theoretical model. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 48, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2013.10.010

Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002

Hu, P. J.-H., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247

Ikawati, F. R., & Ansyori, A. (2024). A systematic review of RME data privacy and security. Procedia of Engineering and Life Science, 6, 107-113.

Kijsanayotin, B., Pannarunothai, S., & Speedie, S. M. (2009). Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(6), 404-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.12.005

Pai, F.-Y., & Huang, K.-I. (2011). Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(4), 650-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.11.007

Rahimi, B., Nadri, H., Lotfnezhad Afshar, H., & Timpka, T. (2018). A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Applied Clinical Informatics, 9(3), 604-634. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668091

Shiferaw, K. B., Mehari, E. A., & Fenta, G. B. (2021). Healthcare providers' acceptance of telemedicine and preference of modalities during COVID-19 pandemics in a low-resource setting: An extended UTAUT model. PLOS ONE, 16(4), e0250220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250220

Tetik, G., Türkeli, S., Pinar, S., & Tarim, M. (2024). Health information systems with technology acceptance model approach: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 190, 105556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105556

Tsirintani, M. (2024). Use of TAM questionnaire for telemedicine and IT healthcare systems. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 316, 1189-1192. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI240623

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Fita Rusdian Ikawati, Atik Setiawan W, & Novita Ana Anggraini. (2026). A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Digital Health Technology Adoption Among Healthcare Workers . Jurnal Ventilator, 4(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.59680/ventilator.v4i1.2387

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.