STRATEGI JURNAL PREDATOR MENGUNDANG PUBLIKASI MELALUI EMAIL
MENGAJAK KONTRIBUSI DALAM KONFERENSI DAN PUBLIKASI JURNAL, APAKAH TERJEBAK?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jufdikes.v5i1.178Keywords:
Beall’s List, jurnal predator, jurnal kedokteran, jurnal kesehatan, publikasi ilmiahAbstract
Publikasi ilmiah menjadi tantangan tersendiri untuk menyebarluaskan informasi hasil riset kepada khalayak ilmiah. Sering kali penulis diharuskan memilih beberapa opsi publikasi, termasuk prosiding konferensi hingga artikel jurnal. Dewasa ini telah marak publikasi ilmiah dengan slogan jalur cepat, baik dengan biaya murah hingga biaya fantastis. Penulis kerap kali mendapatkan email dari editor-editor tertentu untuk mengajak berkontribusi dalam publikasi ilmiah melalui konferensi dan jurnal. Kedua strategi ini digunakan melalui alamat email penulis yang pernah mempublikasikan karya ilmiah sebelumnya, sehingga alamat email dengan mudah didapatkan untuk undangan ilmiah tersebut. Kami mendapatkan undangan dari editor jurnal kedokteran untuk berkontribusi dalam konferensi internasional mereka, serta termasuk ajakan untuk publikasi artikel jurnal pada jurnal mereka. Biaya yang ditawarkan cukup fantastis, apabila dalam memilih opsi publikasi ke jurnal tidak dengan hati-hati dan cermat, dikhawatirkan akan terjebak dengan strategi ini. Strategi sederhana ialah melalui mesin pencarian dengan mencantumkan nama jurnal tersebut, salah satu portal yang memberikan diskusi berupa Research Gate. Temuan kami ini dapat menjadi nasehat untuk para penulis yang hendak mempublikasikan karya ilmiahnya di jurnal dengan integritas ilmiah tinggi dan melalui proses ulasan sejawat yang ketat.
References
D. Moher and A. Srivastava, ‘You are invited to submit...’, BMC Med., vol. 13, p. 180, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1186/S12916-015-0423-3/TABLES/1.
E. Mercier, P. A. Tardif, L. Moore, N. Le Sage, and P. A. Cameron, ‘Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: A 12-month early-career researcher experience’, Postgrad. Med. J., vol. 94, no. 1108, pp. 104–108, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1136/POSTGRADMEDJ-2017-135097.
G. Richtig, M. Berger, B. Lange-Asschenfeldt, W. Aberer, and E. Richtig, ‘Problems and challenges of predatory journals’, J. Eur. Acad. Dermatology Venereol., vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1441–1449, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1111/JDV.15039.
J. Beall, ‘Predatory publishers are corrupting open access’, Nature, vol. 489, no. 7415, p. 179, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1038/489179a.
D. Butler, ‘Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing’, Nature, vol. 495, no. 7442, pp. 433–435, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1038/495433A.
J. Beall, ‘Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access’, Learn. Publ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 79–84, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1087/20130203.
J. Beall, ‘Scholarly open-access publishing and the problem of predatory publishers’, J. Biol. Phys. Chem., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 22–24, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.4024/02BE14F.JBPC.14.01.
J. Beall, ‘Predatory journals: Ban predators from the scientific record’, Nature, vol. 534, no. 7607, p. 326, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1038/534326A.
J. Beall, ‘Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures’, Inf. Dev., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 473–476, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0266666915601421.
T. F. Frandsen, ‘Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers’, Scientometrics, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 1513–1528, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1007/S11192-017-2520-X.
D. F. Jimenez and D. N. Garza, ‘Predatory Publishing and Academic Integrity’, World Neurosurg., vol. 105, pp. 990–992, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.157.
A. Grzybowski, R. Patryn, and J. Sak, ‘Predatory journals and dishonesty in science’, Clin. Dermatol., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 607–610, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2017.07.003.
T. Shamim, ‘Strategies to curb young researchers from predatory publishers’, J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 93, Apr. 2018, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5856910/
A. de La Blanchardière, F. Barde, N. Peiffer-Smadja, and H. Maisonneuve, ‘Predatory journals: A real threat for medical research. 1. Identify these journals and understand how they work’, Rev. Med. Interne, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 421–426, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2021.03.329.
J. Beall, ‘Medical Publishing Triage - Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers’, Ann. Med. Surg., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 47–49, 2013, doi: 10.1016/S2049-0801(13)70035-9.
A. de La Blanchardière, F. Barde, N. Peiffer-Smadja, and H. Maisonneuve, ‘Predatory journals: A real threat for medical research. 2 Assess their consequences and initiate a response’, Rev. Med. Interne, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 427–433, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2021.03.327.
A. Beshyah, M. Basher, and S. Beshyah, ‘A bibliometric analysis of the international medical literature on predatory publishing’, Ibnosina J. Med. Biomed. Sci., vol. 12, no. 01, pp. 23–32, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.4103/IJMBS.IJMBS_25_20.
J. Beall, ‘Medical publishing and the threat of predatory journals’, Int. J. Women’s Dermatology, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 116, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.IJWD.2016.08.002.
J. Beall, ‘Dangerous predatory publishers threaten medical research’, J. Korean Med. Sci., vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1511–1513, 2016, doi: 10.3346/JKMS.2016.31.10.1511.
O. Laccourreye, F. Rubin, and H. Maisonneuve, ‘“Predatory” journals threatening the scientific medical press’, Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Dis., vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 37–39, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2017.08.003.
M. D. Krasowski, J. C. Lawrence, A. S. Briggs, and B. A. Ford, ‘Burden and Characteristics of Unsolicited Emails from Medical/Scientific Journals, Conferences, and Webinars to Faculty and Trainees at an Academic Pathology Department’, J. Pathol. Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 16, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_12_19.
J. Beall, ‘Essential Information about Predatory Publishers and Journals’, Int. High. Educ., no. 86, pp. 2–3, May 2016, doi: 10.6017/IHE.2016.86.9358.
D. E. Irawan et al., ‘Era baru publikasi di Indonesia: status jurnal open access di Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)’, Berk. Ilmu Perpust. dan Inf., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 133, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.22146/BIP.32920.
C. Shen and B. C. Björk, ‘“Predatory” open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics’, BMC Med., vol. 13, no. 1, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1186/S12916-015-0469-2.
A. V. Yurevich and M. A. Yurevich, ‘Rubbish in Science’, Her. Russ. Acad. Sci., vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 445–453, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1134/S1019331621040158.
A. A. Patak, ‘Fake open access trapped the top three Indonesian universities’, unpublished, 2014.
R. E. Bartholomew, ‘Science for sale: The rise of predatory journals’, J. R. Soc. Med., vol. 107, no. 10, pp. 384–385, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0141076814548526.
S. B. Demir, ‘Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?’, J. Informetr., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1296–1311, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.JOI.2018.10.008.
M. H. Kearney et al., ‘Predatory publishing: What authors need to know’, Res. Nurs. Heal., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–3, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1002/NUR.21640.
S. Kurt, ‘Why do authors publish in predatory journals?’, Learn. Publ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 141–147, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1002/LEAP.1150.
D. A. Forero et al., ‘Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research’, Ann. Glob. Heal., vol. 84, no. 4, p. 589, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.29024/AOGH.2389.
M. Berger and J. Cirasella, ‘Beyond Beall’s list: Better understanding predatory publishers’, Coll. Res. Libr. News, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 132–135, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.5860/CRLN.76.3.9277.
J. Beall, ‘What I learned from predatory publishers’, Biochem. Medica, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 273–278, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029
W. Strielkowski, ‘Predatory journals: Beall’s List is missed’, Nature, vol. 544, p. 416, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1038/544416b.
A. Asadi, N. Rahbar, M. Asadi, F. Asadi, and K. Khalili Paji, ‘Online-based approaches to identify real journals and publishers from hijacked ones’, Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 305–308, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9747-9.
T. Shamim, ‘Polite invitation to submit article: Predatory journal’s new strategy’, Saudi J. Anaesth., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 281, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.4103/SJA.SJA_189_19.
D. Rachmawati, ‘PHISING SEBAGAI SALAH SATU BENTUK ANCAMAN DALAM DUNIA CYBER’, J. SAINTIKOM, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 209–216, 2014.
A. Latimer, ‘Predatory Conferences: What Social Workers Need to Know’, J. Soc. Work Educ., 2021, doi: 10.1080/10437797.2021.1977754.
M. Dadkhah, M. D. Jazi, and S. Pacukaj, ‘Fake conferences for earning real money’, Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 11–12, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.5901/MJSS.2015.V6N2P11.
H. Ritchie et al., ‘Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19)’, Our World in Data, 2020. https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus
L. M. Baker, M. P. Benge, A. Zagonel, J. Shellhouse, C. R. Boyer, and P. Stokes, ‘Don’t Fake It, Make It! Thriving in Virtual Conferences and Meetings’, Edis, vol. 2020, no. 4, pp. 1–4, 2020, doi: 10.32473/edis-wc365-2020.
N. Ayedee and A. Kumar, ‘Indian education system and growing number of online conferences: Scenario under COVID-19’, Asian J. Manag., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 395–401, 2020, doi: 10.5958/2321-5763.2020.00060.8.
D. Kagan, G. F. Alpert, and M. Fire, ‘Zooming Into Video Conferencing Privacy and Security Threats’, arXiv Prepr., Jul. 2020, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2007.01059.
J.-L. Mergny, ‘Announcement - The fake meeting society’, Biochimie, vol. 93, 2011, doi: 10.1016/S0300-9084(11)00044-7.
A.-I. Petrisor, ‘Evolving strategies of the predatory journals’, Malaysian J. Libr. Inf. Sci., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–17, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.22452/MJLIS.VOL21NO1.1.
D. Pecorari, ‘Predatory Conferences: What Are the Signs?’, J. Acad. Ethics, 2021, doi: 10.1007/S10805-021-09406-4.
A. Cortegiani, A. Manca, and A. Giarratano, ‘Predatory journals and conferences: Why fake counts’, Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 192–197, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000829.
S. Kahan and R. F. Kushner, ‘New Year’s Resolution: Say No to Fake Journals and Conferences’, Obesity, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 11–12, 2017.
D. Dagens, ‘5 Predator publishing or fake science? A case series of 75 unsolicited emails received from “predator journals”’, BMJ Evidence-Based Med., vol. 24, pp. A3–A4, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1136/BMJEBM-2019-EBMLIVE.5.
C. Laine and M. A. Winker, ‘Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals’, Biochem. Medica, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 285–91, 2017, doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.031.
A. Six-Means, ‘Predatory Publications: What Are They, How They Impact Nursing, and How to Identify Them’, J. Pediatr. Surg. Nurs., Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1097/JPS.0000000000000362.
M. H. Oermann et al., ‘Study of Predatory Open Access Nursing Journals’, J. Nurs. Scholarsh., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 624–632, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1111/JNU.12248.
L. Shamseer et al., ‘Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison’, BMC Med., vol. 15, no. 1, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1186/S12916-017-0785-9.
H. Sharma and S. Verma, ‘Predatory conferences in biomedical streams: An invitation for academic upliftment or predator’s looking for prey’, Saudi J. Anaesth., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 212, 2020, doi: 10.4103/SJA.SJA_668_19:10.4103/SJA.SJA_668_19.
A. Manca, L. Cugusi, A. Cortegiani, G. Ingoglia, D. Moher, and F. Deriu, ‘Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding’, BMJ, vol. 371, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1136/BMJ.M4265.
J. Galipeau et al., ‘A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals’, BMC Med., vol. 14, no. 1, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1186/S12916-016-0561-2.
Z. Huseynova, N. Pandis, and C. M. Faggion, ‘PRESUMED PREDATORY JOURNALS ARE ABUNDANT IN ORAL HEALTH’, J. Evid. Based. Dent. Pract., vol. 21, no. 2, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101539.
R. Van Den Berg, N. Nezami, V. Nguyen, J. K. Sicklick, and C. R. Weiss, ‘A solution to academic radiology’s experience with solicitation e-mails from predatory journals’, Am. J. Roentgenol., vol. 216, no. 1, pp. 233–240, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22923.
J. R. Yan et al., ‘Predatory publishing in orthopaedic research’, J. Bone Jt. Surg. - Am. Vol., vol. 100, no. 21, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01569.
A. J. Maddy and A. Tosti, ‘Predatory journals in dermatology’, Br. J. Dermatol., vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 307–309, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1111/BJD.15072.
S. J. Bakri and S. M. Shah, ‘Predatory Publishing in Ophthalmology: A Call for Awareness and Action’, Am. J. Ophthalmol., vol. 221, pp. 207–210, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.009.
A. Manca, G. Martinez, L. Cugusi, D. Dragone, Z. Dvir, and F. Deriu, ‘The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology’, Neuroscience, vol. 353, pp. 166–173, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.NEUROSCIENCE.2017.04.014.
P. D. Delgado-López and E. M. Corrales-García, ‘Influence of Internet and Social Media in the Promotion of Alternative Oncology, Cancer Quackery, and the Predatory Publishing Phenomenon’, Cureus, vol. 10, no. 5, p. e2617, May 2018, doi: 10.7759/CUREUS.2617.
B. Hansoti, M. I. Langdorf, and L. S. Murphy, ‘Discriminating Between Legitimate and Predatory Open Access Journals: Report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee’, West. J. Emerg. Med., vol. 17, no. 5, p. 507, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.5811/WESTJEM.2016.7.30328.
T. Nguyen, R. McIntire, R. Ottwell, M. Hartwell, and M. Vassar, ‘Evaluation of Predatory Journal Publication in Systematic Reviews in the Top Five Emergency Medicine Journals: A Cross-Sectional Analysis’, in Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences Research Days 2021, Feb. 2021, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 343–354. doi: 10.2/JQUERY.MIN.JS.
A. Cortegiani, F. Sanfilippo, J. Tramarin, and A. Giarratano, ‘Predatory open-access publishing in critical care medicine’, J. Crit. Care, vol. 50, pp. 247–249, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.12.016.
C. Bianchini, C. Consentino, M. Paci, and M. Baccini, ‘Open Access Physical Therapy Journals: Do Predatory Journals Publish Lower-Quality Randomized Controlled Trials?’, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 969–977, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.12.012.
A. Mudry, ‘Polluting and harassing “otorhinolaryngological” emails: Has the time arrived to talk openly about it?’, Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Dis., 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2022.03.004.
R. J. Dinis-Oliveira, ‘Predatory journals and meetings in forensic sciences: what every expert needs to know about this “parasitic” publishing model’, Forensic Sci. Res., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 303–309, 2021, doi: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1989548.
I. Masic, ‘Predatory Publishing – Experience with OMICS International’, Med. Arch., vol. 71, no. 5, p. 307, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.5455/MEDARH.2017.71.304-307.
R. R. Al Hakim et al., ‘Aplikasi Algoritma Dijkstra dalam Penyelesaian Berbagai Masalah’, Expert J. Manaj. Sist. Inf. dan Teknol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 2021, doi: 10.36448/expert.v11i1.1939.
R. R. Al Hakim, C. D. Imtiyaaz, D. Setyawaty, F. Rahayu, and P. Rianti, ‘Daily Behaviour of Long-tailed Macaque in the Captive, Semi-wild, and Wild Habitats: Preliminary Reports’, Indones. J. Primatol., vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 25–32, Oct. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/primatology/article/view/43749
European Society of Medicine, ‘ESMED General Assembly 2022 - European Society of Medicine’, Aug. 2022. https://esmed.org/conferences/2022assembly/ (accessed Dec. 16, 2022).
R. R. Al Hakim, E. Rusdi, and M. A. Setiawan, ‘Android Based Expert System Application for Diagnose COVID-19 Disease: Cases Study of Banyumas Regency’, J. Intell. Comput. Heal. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.26714/jichi.v1i2.5958.
European Society of Medicine, ‘Registration Conference’, 2022 ESMED General Assembly , 2021. https://esmed.org/registration-conference/ (accessed Dec. 17, 2022).
Office of Information Technology Brown University, ‘European Society of Medicine solicitations’, Phishing Email (on campus), Oct. 26, 2021. https://it.brown.edu/phish-bowl-alerts/european-society-medicine-solicitations (accessed Dec. 17, 2022).
G. Trentacosti and P. Braun, ‘UG/UMCG authors falling prey to fraudulent/predatory publishing practices’, Open Science Blog, Jun. 21, 2021. https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/blog/ug-umcg-authors-falling-prey-to-fraudulent-predatory-publishing-practices?lang=en (accessed Dec. 17, 2022).
ResearchGate, ‘Dear Authors. Please who can give me an information aboutEuropean Society of Medicine, with thanks’, Discussion, Oct. 27, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/post/Dear_Authors_Please_who_can_give_me_an_information_aboutEuropean_Society_of_Medicine_with_thanks (accessed Dec. 17, 2022).
Flaky Academic Conferences, ‘European Society of Medicine (ESMED) Congresses and Events’, Nov. 27, 2020. http://flakyc.blogspot.com/2020/11/european-society-of-medicine-esmed.html (accessed Dec. 17, 2022).
Riddled, ‘I light-heartedly gave a list of names which, for all I knew, I might hear:Hugh MurrayConstantin PetriePeter SmallSignor Beniamino BariThe Honourable Alex O’Brannigan, Bart.Kurt FreundMr John P. de Salis, M.A.Dr Solway GarrBonaparte GosworthLegs O’Hagan’, Mar. 21, 2020. http://eusa-riddled.blogspot.com/2020/03/i-light-heartedly-gave-list-of-names.html (accessed Dec. 17, 2022).
European Society of Medicine, ‘Special Issue?: Advancements in COVID 19 – 2nd issue’, 2022. https://esmed.org/special-issue-advancements-in-covid-19-2nd/ (accessed Dec. 17, 2022).
A. Manca, D. Moher, L. Cugusi, Z. Dvir, and F. Deriu, ‘How predatory journals leak into PubMed’, CMAJ, vol. 190, no. 35, pp. E1042–E1045, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1503/CMAJ.180154.
W. Strielkowski, ‘Predatory Publishing: What Are the Alternatives to Beall’s List?’, Am. J. Med., vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 333–334, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.054.
W. H. Walters, ‘The citation impact of the Open Access accounting journals that appear on Beall’s List of potentially predatory publishers and journals’, J. Acad. Librariansh., vol. 48, no. 1, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102484.
E. Kulczycki, M. Ho?owiecki, Z. Ta?k?n, and F. Krawczyk, ‘Citation patterns between impact-factor and questionable journals’, Scientometrics, vol. 126, no. 10, pp. 8541–8560, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1007/S11192-021-04121-8.
J. Beall, ‘Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals’, Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl., vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 77–79, 2016, doi: 10.1308/RCSANN.2016.0056.
Y. Masten and A. Ashcraft, ‘Due diligence in the open-access explosion era: Choosing a reputable journal for publication’, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., vol. 364, no. 21, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1093/FEMSLE/FNX206.
J. Buitrago Ciro, ‘How are academic libraries in Spanish-speaking Latin America responding to new models of scholarly communication and predatory publishing?’, J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 373–388, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1177/09610006211016533.
A. R. Memon, ‘Revisiting the term predatory open access publishing’, J. Korean Med. Sci., vol. 34, no. 13, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.3346/JKMS.2019.34.E99.
S. Beshyah, ‘Predatory publishing: A wake-up call for editors and authors in the Middle East and Africa’, Ibnosina J. Med. Biomed. Sci., vol. 09, no. 05, pp. 123–125, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.4103/IJMBS.IJMBS_26_17.
